Massive Leak Exposes 273,000 Indian Bank Transfer Records Online

data breach bank records cybersecurity NACH financial data leak Amazon S3 UpGuard identity theft
Edward Zhou
Edward Zhou

CEO & Co-Founder

 
September 29, 2025
3 min read

Data Breach Exposes 2.73 Lakh Bank Records

An unsecured cloud server exposed hundreds of thousands of bank transfer records, revealing names, bank account details, and contact information. Cybersecurity firm UpGuard discovered over 2.73 lakh files on the Amazon server on August 26, each showing unmasked account numbers, transaction amounts, and personal contact details.

Image for Data breach exposes 2.73 lakh bank records


Image courtesy of The Economic Times

The exposed data included sensitive information from 38 banks and non-bank lenders. Notably, over half the records were attributed to IPO-bound non-banking finance company Aye Finance (59.63%). Other affected lenders included State Bank of India (24.22%) and Muthoot Capital (13.31%).

The data was formatted according to the requirements of the National Automated Clearing House (NACH), a service created by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) to streamline electronic transactions. NPCI confirmed that the leak did not originate from their systems.

Timeline of Events

  • August 26: UpGuard discovered the publicly accessible Amazon S3 cloud storage bucket containing approximately 273,000 PDF documents.
  • August 27: Notifications sent to Aye Finance regarding the breach.
  • August 29: UpGuard escalated the issue to NPCI.
  • September 4: The exposed bucket was secured after UpGuard notified CERT-In, the government’s cyber incident response team.

Data Statistics

  • Total files: 273,160
  • Size of data: 210GB
  • Sample size analyzed: 55,000 files
  • Affected banks: 38
  • Average new files added daily: ~3,000

Researchers found that the transaction forms contained critical financial data, including transaction dates and bank account numbers, with many also displaying individuals' names, phone numbers, and email addresses.

Redacted example of exposed transaction form


Image courtesy of UpGuard

Affected Organizations

Among the banks, Aye Finance was the most frequently mentioned institution, appearing in nearly 60% of the documents sampled. Despite this, it is dwarfed by larger banks such as the State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank.

Bank Mentions Percentage
Aye Finance 32,798 59.63%
State Bank of India 13,319 24.22%
Muthoot Capital 7,320 13.31%
Bank of Baroda 6,124 11.13%
Punjab National Bank 5,831 10.60%

NPCI confirmed that all documents were related to NACH transactions, indicating that the source of the leak was not linked to their systems.

Misconfiguration and Security Response

Nupay, a fintech company, took responsibility for the data exposure, attributing it to a configuration error in an Amazon S3 storage bucket. The company stated that the bucket contained a limited set of records, with many being dummy or test files. However, UpGuard disputed this claim, asserting that a significant portion of the documents contained sensitive information.

UpGuard's analysis indicated that the risk of fraud was heightened due to the exposure of bank account numbers and transaction details, emphasizing the need for stringent data security measures across all institutions involved in NACH.

Screenshot of NACH mandate metadata


Image courtesy of UpGuard

Implications of the Data Leak

The exposed data poses significant risks, including potential for fraud and identity theft. The nature of the NACH system, which aggregates data from multiple institutions, amplifies the impact of such breaches. As UpGuard noted, the configuration issue could have occurred at any point in the chain involving NPCI, banks, and other integration partners.

In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, organizations must prioritize robust data security protocols to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Edward Zhou
Edward Zhou

CEO & Co-Founder

 

CEO & Co-Founder of Gopher Security, leading the development of Post-Quantum cybersecurity technologies and solutions.

Related News

NIST Standards Drive 2026 Mandates for Securing AI Infrastructure and Model Context Protocol Deployments
NIST AI Risk Management Framework

NIST Standards Drive 2026 Mandates for Securing AI Infrastructure and Model Context Protocol Deployments

Prepare for 2026 NIST AI mandates. Learn how to secure autonomous agents and Model Context Protocol (MCP) deployments against evolving enterprise security threats.

By Alan V Gutnov June 11, 2026 6 min read
common.read_full_article
Active Directory Certificate Services Now Supports Post-Quantum Cryptography for Windows Environments
Post-Quantum Cryptography AD CS

Active Directory Certificate Services Now Supports Post-Quantum Cryptography for Windows Environments

Microsoft adds Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) to AD CS. Learn how ML-DSA and hybrid key exchanges protect Windows environments against Harvest Now, Decrypt Later.

By Edward Zhou June 12, 2026 4 min read
common.read_full_article
Enterprises Face 2026 Deadline for NIST-Compliant Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration and Infrastructure Readiness
NIST post-quantum cryptography standards 2026

Enterprises Face 2026 Deadline for NIST-Compliant Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration and Infrastructure Readiness

Is your enterprise ready for the 2026 NIST PQC deadline? Learn how to mitigate Harvest Now, Decrypt Later threats and update your infrastructure to quantum-resistant standards.

By Brandon Woo June 10, 2026 7 min read
common.read_full_article
Cloud and Zero Trust Architecture Adoption Accelerate Modernization of Industrial Control Systems Security
industrial control systems zero trust

Cloud and Zero Trust Architecture Adoption Accelerate Modernization of Industrial Control Systems Security

Explore how Zero Trust Architecture and cloud adoption are transforming Industrial Control Systems (ICS) security to mitigate modern cyber threats.

By Alan V Gutnov June 9, 2026 4 min read
common.read_full_article